The Barker books are pretty depressing, in the sense that most of the characters are in a horrific situation that they will never get out of — the best they can hope for is to survive and forge some sense of community in the margins. For me, this is enough — as long as there is a sense that characters are able to find a sense of connection with each other, and moments of happiness and meaning, it doesn't really matter to me if they're otherwise living in a completely dystopian situation. But we all have our own limits when it comes to reading this sort of thing, and I see no reason why you should force yourself to read this series if you think you'll find it unrelentingly bleak.
Regarding Babel, I just find it insulting to me as a reader. It's as if the book is trying to handhold me into responding correctly not just to the story as a whole, but to individual incidents and throwaway lines within it — it feels like a lack of trust in the reader's ability to interpret meaning. It's also very dispiriting that all this feels like a preemptive attempt to deflect anticipated criticism — as if the book were written with an imagined Twitter mob looking over the author's shoulder, threatening to descend and harangue her about her lack of knowledge or insufficient ideological purity.
no subject
Regarding Babel, I just find it insulting to me as a reader. It's as if the book is trying to handhold me into responding correctly not just to the story as a whole, but to individual incidents and throwaway lines within it — it feels like a lack of trust in the reader's ability to interpret meaning. It's also very dispiriting that all this feels like a preemptive attempt to deflect anticipated criticism — as if the book were written with an imagined Twitter mob looking over the author's shoulder, threatening to descend and harangue her about her lack of knowledge or insufficient ideological purity.