Active Entries
- 1: We can rely on each other from one corner to another
- 2: New podfic made of my fic
- 3: We know everything about us
- 4: And the only sound is the broken sea
- 5: Rally in London in support of abducted Ukrainian children
- 6: Underdog stories
- 7: 'Some say this is progressive house, but we all know this is progressive home'
- 8: Friday open thread: douze points
- 9: All in the blue unclouded weather
Style Credit
- Style: Bold Dances for Dusty Foot by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-06-27 03:21 pm (UTC)There was a lot of, "I think you're X if you like Y," type stuff flying around, and yeah, that's not cool. There are a lot of people who can recognize where and why something is problematic and enjoy it anyway. It's one thing to discuss the problems that arise, but when it turns into relentless judging/shaming/mocking of the fans, it's lost its purpose.
This is what I was trying to address in the paragraphs about Supernatural, the Whedonverse etc. I myself don't know the exact context either, as I tend to hover on the fringes of fandom myself (in places like the aforementioned Tiger Beatdown). Of course people shouldn't be shamed for enjoying something, but it's been my experience in the few cases that these issues have arisen to be much more along the lines of 'there are possibly some troubling issues relating to race in this text' 'HOW DARE YOU CALL ME A RACIST???', which is something different entirely. There needs to be a space within fandom for people to raise concerns about potentially problematic issues.
Does that make sense?
__________________________________
*To be fair, I used to be one of those people. One of these days I must post the contents of this ridiculously pompous letter I sent the children's books editor of a newspaper about her (slightly critical) review of The Amber Spyglass. It's cringeworthy.