Active Entries
- 1: New podfic made of my fic
- 2: We know everything about us
- 3: And the only sound is the broken sea
- 4: Rally in London in support of abducted Ukrainian children
- 5: Underdog stories
- 6: 'Some say this is progressive house, but we all know this is progressive home'
- 7: Friday open thread: douze points
- 8: All in the blue unclouded weather
- 9: The blades of green, green grass
Style Credit
- Style: Bold Dances for Dusty Foot by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2013-06-27 07:07 pm (UTC)About five or six years ago, I was talking to my dad about how political journalism had changed in the years he'd been working in that field. He said to me, with a great deal of sadness, that what had changed in recent years was that most political journalists now saw themselves not as observers, but somehow as part of the story. (He wasn't claiming that any journalist could be truly impartial, even before these changes, but that impartiality was something they should have been striving towards and holding up as an ideal.) I think that's what's behind how the media have behaved in this whole debacle. They did the same thing back in the day with Howard and Costello, and they basically destroyed Costello's career. So when you ask
Why keep allowing Rudd to be relevant? Why keep running stupid articles about how Rudd was on the move again?
I think that you have your answer.