Repost of a repost
Dec. 4th, 2009 09:58 pm![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
"I've probably written about this before, but man, when's the last time you had a click moment? Here's my latest one:
So I've been reading a collection of essays titled Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape. All of the contributions are really good, but for some reason I never made the connection about why it's "yes means yes" rather than the old "no means no" trope. Well, I was reading over in the Feministing Community blog about Ask Amy's victim-blaming and the author laid it out in such a way that it blew my mind:
Dear Amy:
In your response to the young woman who was raped at a frat party you repeated the old saying, “No means no.” This is an outdated model of consent. Women do not exist in a state of perpetual consent to sex, which they must cancel out by saying “no” in order to prevent a man from having sex with them. Consent means an enthusiastic “yes” from both parties, not just a lack a “no.” I hope you will use your column to remind people that yes, and only yes, means yes.
Aha! So remember kids: yes means yes!"
Some of you may know why this means so much to me.