Democracy sausage for all
Oct. 31st, 2020 05:20 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
dolorosa_12Various links relating to Australian politics (or, more specifically, the Australian electoral system) have come into my orbit in the past couple of days, so I thought I'd gather them in one place, because they touch on things I've been chatting with people here about in the past couple of weeks. (lirazel and kore, in various comment threads, if I recall correctly.)
The defining thing about the Australian electoral/voting system is the fact that we have compulsory voting. (Technically, of course, what is compulsory is showing up at the polling station and taking a ballot paper — since voting is secret, there is no way of checking whether a person has actually voted or not.) As a result of this rule, there are all sorts of positive knock on effects — because if everyone must vote, you need to set up a system which makes it as easy as possible to do so.
Former NSW premier Bob Carr wrote an interesting (and depressing) article in The Guardian comparing the Australian system with the US one. I find it a bit smug (surely it's not news to most Americans that the electoral system there is a complete anti-democratic disgrace), but I like how clearly it lays out all the things I, as an Australian whose formative experiences of democracy were the Australian kind, take for granted. (The big thing is turnout: I grew up with the idea that a turnout of 95 per cent or so was normal, and can still remember how shocked and horrified I was when I found out that 60 or so per cent turnout was considered high in other parts of the world.)
One thing which I've always found particularly delightful about this need to ensure everyone is able to vote is the fact that the Australian Electoral Commission literally flies helicopters around to remote communities, hand-delivering and collecting ballots. This BBC article explains the process.
This other Guardian article by a woman who has written a history of voting in Australia I think overstates the case. She claims that compulsory voting has saved Australia from 'Trumpist' politics, whereas I feel that Australia is plagued with exactly the same kind of far-right anti-science, anti-expertise politics experienced everywhere with a Murdoch-dominated press. What I do appreciate, though, is the fact that Australian elections cannot be won on turnout, and their results do at least represent (sadly) what a true majority of people want. And unfortunately what a majority of Australians want is blandly centre-right suburban politics.
My final link is an account from the ABC (i.e. Australian state broadcaster) foreign correspondent in Washington, recapping his experiences of living and working there since last November. This was actually the job my father had when I was a very small toddler (around the same age as the current correspondent's son is now), but I suspect he and my mother had a very different time of it back then!
lirazel and kore, in various comment threads, if I recall correctly.)The defining thing about the Australian electoral/voting system is the fact that we have compulsory voting. (Technically, of course, what is compulsory is showing up at the polling station and taking a ballot paper — since voting is secret, there is no way of checking whether a person has actually voted or not.) As a result of this rule, there are all sorts of positive knock on effects — because if everyone must vote, you need to set up a system which makes it as easy as possible to do so.
Former NSW premier Bob Carr wrote an interesting (and depressing) article in The Guardian comparing the Australian system with the US one. I find it a bit smug (surely it's not news to most Americans that the electoral system there is a complete anti-democratic disgrace), but I like how clearly it lays out all the things I, as an Australian whose formative experiences of democracy were the Australian kind, take for granted. (The big thing is turnout: I grew up with the idea that a turnout of 95 per cent or so was normal, and can still remember how shocked and horrified I was when I found out that 60 or so per cent turnout was considered high in other parts of the world.)
One thing which I've always found particularly delightful about this need to ensure everyone is able to vote is the fact that the Australian Electoral Commission literally flies helicopters around to remote communities, hand-delivering and collecting ballots. This BBC article explains the process.
This other Guardian article by a woman who has written a history of voting in Australia I think overstates the case. She claims that compulsory voting has saved Australia from 'Trumpist' politics, whereas I feel that Australia is plagued with exactly the same kind of far-right anti-science, anti-expertise politics experienced everywhere with a Murdoch-dominated press. What I do appreciate, though, is the fact that Australian elections cannot be won on turnout, and their results do at least represent (sadly) what a true majority of people want. And unfortunately what a majority of Australians want is blandly centre-right suburban politics.
My final link is an account from the ABC (i.e. Australian state broadcaster) foreign correspondent in Washington, recapping his experiences of living and working there since last November. This was actually the job my father had when I was a very small toddler (around the same age as the current correspondent's son is now), but I suspect he and my mother had a very different time of it back then!