Active Entries
- 1: New podfic made of my fic
- 2: We know everything about us
- 3: And the only sound is the broken sea
- 4: Rally in London in support of abducted Ukrainian children
- 5: Underdog stories
- 6: 'Some say this is progressive house, but we all know this is progressive home'
- 7: Friday open thread: douze points
- 8: All in the blue unclouded weather
- 9: The blades of green, green grass
Style Credit
- Style: Bold Dances for Dusty Foot by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2021-07-06 07:06 pm (UTC)Bad experiences with transphobia may certainly explain why — for example — Neon Yang decided to get involved, but I don't find it convincing when it comes to cis people like NK Jemisin, who admitted she gave her own take on the story without having read it. If nothing else, I hope that this episode will teach people to look before they leap, and just approach Twitter with a bit more thoughtfulness, and approach each situation asking themselves if adding their own hot take is actually going to be helpful.
I think there is this tendency on the part of the wider public to view each incident as sui generis (despite talking about broken Twitter). In the aftermath we unpack the particulars of the communities and individuals involved, the material that set off the storm, what the intention behind it was, what could have been done differently. We look for explanations.
Agreed, which is why I think it's important to look at who was involved, and whether there are any long-term patterns of behaviour — a lot of the people who leapt into the fray in the Isobel Fall situation are names I recognise from the past fifteen years of online conflicts and pile ons, predating Twitter in some cases. This is why I'm so insistent that focusing on toxic platforms is a huge mistake: we need to look at people (individual bad actors, and bad group dynamics) and focus on their behaviour.