Active Entries
- 1: We know everything about us
- 2: And the only sound is the broken sea
- 3: New podfic made of my fic
- 4: Rally in London in support of abducted Ukrainian children
- 5: Underdog stories
- 6: 'Some say this is progressive house, but we all know this is progressive home'
- 7: Friday open thread: douze points
- 8: All in the blue unclouded weather
- 9: The blades of green, green grass
- 10: The light on the hill burns bright
Style Credit
- Style: Bold Dances for Dusty Foot by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2025-04-01 07:36 pm (UTC)The criticisms that fail to notice this, as well as failing to notice what was being said in episodes two and three, seem to come from people who want everything spelt out in blazing letters. It's as if they wanted a courtroom scene in which Jamie suddenly admitted his guilt and motives like a comic book villain speech, or for some other character (the psychologist, or perhaps one of the two police officers) to almost turn to the camera and tell viewers the motives in unambiguous terms.
I understand where that criticism re: Katie is coming from, but I also fundamentally feel that it's criticising the show for not doing something it was never trying to do to begin with. I'm also not sure I agree with the timeline (the writer seems to be arguing that Katie's Instagram comments came before Jamie's abortive attempt to ask her out, and radicalised him, whereas I think he was already somewhat stewing in incel culture before that; the timeline I recall from the show is: her topless photos get spread around the school, Jamie thinks she'll consequently be feeling vulnerable and asks her out (i.e. classic manosphere attitudes towards women and relationships), she rejects him and then writes the stuff on Instagram).
Anyay, definitely a show that has provoked a lot of discussion (especially here in the UK).