AI scam bots on Dreamwidth
Aug. 18th, 2025 07:08 pmA quick heads up to let people know that the extractive AI spammers/scammers from AO3 seem to have made it over here to Dreamwidth. I received a message from one of them just now, which reads:
Hi, I thoroughly enjoyed your story when I read it. I would love to offer some suggestions that could improve your narrative even further, if that is okay with you. Is it feasible for us to communicate via a different platform?
Email address: karencrabtree98@gmail.com
Discord: karencrabtree_
The account is
karencrab, but I would assume there are others active. This one has only existed for a few days, has made no comments, no posts, nor contributed to a single comm, and has a blank/weirdly inconsistent profile.
I'm going to block the account now, but I don't think there's much more I can do about it (unless anyone is aware of a mechanism for reporting suspected AI bot accounts to Dreamwidth). I would assume this means public posts on Dreamwidth are going to be more directly targeted as sources to train AI tools (although I know that this was happening already).
Please feel free to share this warning post.
Hi, I thoroughly enjoyed your story when I read it. I would love to offer some suggestions that could improve your narrative even further, if that is okay with you. Is it feasible for us to communicate via a different platform?
Email address: karencrabtree98@gmail.com
Discord: karencrabtree_
The account is
I'm going to block the account now, but I don't think there's much more I can do about it (unless anyone is aware of a mechanism for reporting suspected AI bot accounts to Dreamwidth). I would assume this means public posts on Dreamwidth are going to be more directly targeted as sources to train AI tools (although I know that this was happening already).
Please feel free to share this warning post.
no subject
Date: 2025-08-18 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-18 06:56 pm (UTC)Thoughts
Date: 2025-08-18 06:45 pm (UTC)You may also want to contact the developers. They've taken assertive action against spammers in the past, so will likely respond to this as well.
Re: Thoughts
Date: 2025-08-18 06:56 pm (UTC)Re: Thoughts
Date: 2025-08-18 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-18 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-18 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-18 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-18 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-18 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-18 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-19 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-19 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-19 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-22 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-19 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-21 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-22 09:36 pm (UTC)I got the same message from
donnapsencer a few days ago. It felt fishy, but I've now marked it as spam without compunction.
no subject
Date: 2025-08-24 10:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-08-24 03:46 pm (UTC)Yes, they acted on it quickly, which is reassuring. I appreciate you posting about this.