dolorosa_12: (robin marian)
Day Sixteen: Favorite mother character

Catelyn Stark (A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones)

Sorry to have dropped this meme for a few days. It's just been very hectic recently and I didn't have the time to give blogging my full attention until today.

My Catelyn Stark is a weird amalgam of book!Catelyn, show!Catelyn and idealised-character-I-have-created-in-my-head!Catelyn, so please bear that in mind. She's one of my favourite fictional characters ever, for several reasons.

I think we've established over the past few entries of this meme that I have several qualities that I adore in fictional characters: characters who make compromises, practice diplomacy, and try to give people what they want if it means their survival and the survival of those they love, characters who are fiercely self-sacrificing in the face of threats to their loved ones, characters whose pragmatism is often ignored by others but later shown in the narrative to have been the correct approach.

In other words, Catelyn Stark. She is much more savvy than her detractors - within the text and among the fandom - normally give her credit for. She has a caution and a better ability to read people than most of the men around her - certainly her husband, and her son Robb - so she often comes across as fairly Cassandra-like, dispensing advice that is ignored, offering warnings that should have been heeded, and more willing to make way for allies' or enemies' demands if it means she and hers live to fight another day. All this caution and flexibility is because she is motivated by a single desire: to ensure her children's survival. I've always got the impression that Catelyn would have preferred to stay out of the way in the North, secure in Winterfell and taking no part in the political machinations of Westeros. But once her husband and children pulled her beyond Winterfell's walls, she made the best of a bad situation, and threw everything into first her husband's and then her son's cause.

Catelyn's detractors always hold her treatment of Jon Snow against her, so I will end this post by addressing that. I'm of the belief that Catelyn's attitude towards Jon - who is, at least in her mind, her husband's illegitimate son, and the same age as Ned's first legitimate son with her - is shaped less by his existence and presence in her home and more by Ned's continued refusal to let Catelyn in on the circumstances of his birth and conception. It's the secrecy, rather than the unfaithfulness, that causes her to feel the way she does, and even though some of the things she says and does to Jon are completely inexcusable, this does at least make sense of her actions and feelings.

The other days )
dolorosa_12: (emily hanna)
The 'Aims Project' is a multifandom vid album, in which each participant has made a fanvid using the music of one song from Vienna Teng's Aims album. Each vid is astoundingly lovely.

I was recently alerted to the existence of 'We Are Sansa Stark', an old essay on Pornokitsch. I don't agree with every one of its conclusions - particularly that Sansa is definitely going to end up a major political player in the series - nor do I think it's helpful to criticise fandom for pitting Sansa and Arya against each other and then...do the same. But I love Sansa and characters like her, and sometimes it's just nice to see them get a bit of love.

This post by [tumblr.com profile] anneursu takes all the sneering critics of YA literature to task, and does so excellently. Read the whole thing.

'When Gods and Vampires Roamed Miami' is a short story by Kendare Blake published on Tor.com. It's set in the world of her Goddess Wars series (which I hadn't heard of but then promptly reserved at the library), and is set in a mid-'90s Miami crawling with gods and goddesses, and Lost Boys-inspired vampire wannabes.

I'm a massive fan of this animated credits to Buffy the Vampire Slayer by Stephen Byrne.

While we wait impatiently for Ancillary Sword, Orbit has put an excerpt from the first chapter up on its website.

This Massive Attack retrospective sums up all my overwhelming feelings of love for this band:

British trip hop pioneers Massive Attack are one of the most celebrated acts in the history of electronic music. Their atmospheric take on hip hop and R&B, with elements of soul, funk, jazz and electronica, was an exciting new sound in the late ’80s and early ’90s. They pioneered the genre now known as trip hop and quickly became hugely influential all around the world. Few electronic acts are held in such high regard as the Bristol-bred outfit. If they had never released their five studio albums, some of today’s great artists may never have gone down the musical paths they chose. Massive Attack are more than a band, they made us rethink how music can be created, and redefined what a band could be.

I still haven't got my copy of Unmade by [livejournal.com profile] sarahtales (Sarah Rees Brennan) and thus can't participate in all the revelry, but she has some great fanart up on her blog, as well as the schedule for her blog tour. I'll be checking out all those posts once I've got around to reading the book.

'I Don't Know How But I Know I Will' is an 8tracks mix by angrygirlsquad 'for those days where you see no way through. you haven’t failed. you are alive. everything else is bonus'.

I hope you are all feeling loved by the people you love, flist.
dolorosa_12: (epic internet)
These are all happy links! I've been feeling really down recently, so I think it's best under the circumstances to focus on the things that have been making me feel better for now.

First up, I was thrilled to discover that [livejournal.com profile] upupa_epops is hosting a meta comment-a-thon over on LJ.


FREE-FOR-ALL META COMMENT-A-THON!
(click on the picture)


You can get there by clicking on the icon.

On a much smaller scale, [community profile] fem_thoughts is hosting a comment meta about female characters, with some really interesting posts already up and running.

Those first two links are thanks to [personal profile] goodbyebird. The next link I encountered through [community profile] metanews, and is a really excellent analysis of Buffy Season Six by [livejournal.com profile] gillo. You can find it here. For a taste:

The point here, I feel is that nice guys do turn into nasty people. Nobody starts out life thinking of themselves as a jerk, but some people turn into jerks even so. And we see, step by step, how that happens – the losers are not losers when they are together. They can rejoice in their technical skills and arcane knowledge of films and TV which matter to them but not, as far as they know, to anyone else. Loners, they want to forge a sense of being part of something bigger. They need to feel adequate in the areas of life which peer pressure has marked out as important – making money, achieving targets, finding partners of the opposite sex. That need to feel adequate subtly shifts into a need to feel they excel. Warren goes the furthest down this dark path, and pays accordingly, but all three of them share that need to be not just good enough but actually important. When you are a child you assume all grown-ups are important – and when you get to be one it can be a shock to find out the truth. In this, as in so much else, the Trio echoes Willow - who also started off as nerdy in a sweet sort of way. You could draw a lot of parallels between Jonathon's increasing need for acceptance from Earshot to Superstar and Willow's need to be in control from advising Cordelia to hit the Deliver key through to riding that big truck.

It's brilliant stuff.

Still on the Buffy theme, Foz Meadows has been doing a rewatch, and has come to some interesting conclusions. I would recommend all her posts on Buffy, but in particular this one about the romantic relationships. I'm not quite sold on her interpretation of Angel, but she's spot on in every other regard, in my opinion.

This gif set on Tumblr is kind of adorable. Be warned, it contains massive spoilers for the most recent episode of Game of Thrones.

Finally, have a link to the Soundcloud page of Seven Lions, just because it is fabulous, fabulous music.
dolorosa_12: (ship)
Last night, this popped up on my Livejournal friends page, via Jo Walton, whose book Among Others is reviewed there. It's a review by Ursula Le Guin of several books, and it's a good example of the rather rocky relationship I have with Le Guin: I love her books, and yet I find her a frustratingly wrong reviewer and critic. 'Wrong' might be too strong a word; 'wrong in her approach' is perhaps better. So she writes things like this:

Since publishers are feeling terribly unsafe these days, and since YA is a big, solid market, and fantasy is a big, solid part of it, publishers feel safe publishing fantasy as YA. And so writers of fantasy may find they’re expected to have kid protagonists and discouraged from writing about adults. Harry whatshisname and the teenie werewolves and the young gladiators have locked the fantasy/YA combo tight, at least for now. Retro macho “epics” of war-and-violence with nominally adult protagonists may escape the YA label, as they reach teen-agers through tie-ins, games, movies.

It's pretty obvious which books she means, and while I have no problem with her disliking Harry Potter, Twilight, The Hunger Games or A Song of Ice and Fire, and while I also feel genre boundaries can be somewhat arbitrary and an impediment to reading, and that adults can get things out of books with child protagonists and children can get things out of books with adult protagonists, the things they are getting are different. There is a fundamental difference in how you read a book as a child, and how you read it as an adult. (For a good example, I read Wuthering Heights when I was 14 and again when I was 22 and it was as if I had read two different books.) You have to take into account all these things, like how a person sees the world and his or her place in it, because they do have an effect on your perception of, and reaction to, a particular story. I do think there are some books which have a more powerful effect if you read them at a certain age. (I feel, for example, that ages 12-16, which is what I was when I read the His Dark Materials trilogy, was exactly the right age range to be for that particular story. Victor Kelleher's books, on the other hand, while ostensibly aimed at teenagers, seem to me all the more powerful when read with adult eyes.) And some authors are better than others at capturing the way teenagers think, the way they see the world, the things they dream about and fear. Yes, the YA label is a marketing decision, but sometimes genre distinctions are meaningful. The important thing is to work out what you like, and ignore the genre labels when you need to.

One author who seems to me to be particularly in touch with the feelings and thoughts of her teenage self is Foz Meadows. I really like this interview she did with Tansy Rayner Roberts.

[M]y own experiences as a teenager make me somewhat less than neutral on the subject of both school and the ever-present love triangle. I find it incredibly difficult, if not outright impossible, to write about high school as a background event rather than politically, as an institution to be challenged or subverted, because of the amount of effort I expended as a student arguing against curricula, grading, subject structure, the allocation of resources, conformity and scare tactics. Similarly, and while I have no objection to other people enjoying them, I have a pathological skepticism of romanticised love triangles, because as a teenager, I was in a love triangle – and believe me, the experience was anything but romantic. The combination of unrequited love angst and profound frustration at the institutional mechanics of education left me severely depressed, routinely insomniac (my last year of school, I survived on an average of four to six hours sleep a night, six days a week), flirting with self harm and regularly contemplating suicide. Somehow, I managed to get through it, but it’s not an experience I’d wish on anyone – and as a consequence, I don’t think I’m capable of writing about school, or love triangles, or especially the two in combination, in any sort of neutral or romantic way.

Finally, There Is No Alternative has written a good post about the perils of criticising A Song of Ice and Fire online. It was in response to an article by Laurie Penny on the series, but I've observed it happening several other times, and it always follows a similar pattern. As TINA writes,

Sadly, I have not yet seen any refutation of Laurie’s points which doesn’t itself indulge in the fundamental attribution error of considering her understanding “superficial”, rather than the brevity of her piece to require superficiality, or which doesn’t simply set up straw women to tilt at, claiming that Laurie wanted to watch “Sweden with wizards“, rather than maybe considering whether it might be possible to address those themes with just a little less triggering rape culture and normative violence. Pointing out that these things are still damaging of themselves is not the same as calling for censorship.

I say this as someone who actually reads and enjoys the ASoIaF books: nothing should be free of criticism. It's hard when people criticise your favourite things, because it feels like they are criticising you, personally. But saying that there is a lot of (gratuitous) rape in ASoIaF is not the same as accusing its fans of being rapists, and saying that when you take away the backstabbing and intrigue, the story is basically the standard swords-and-sorcery epic about the need for a just ruler is not the same as saying its fans are simplistic or conservative. ASoIaF fans need to stop reacting as if someone's taken away their favourite toys every time the series is criticised online.
dolorosa_12: (flight of the conchords)
I'm not sure I have the time or the inclination to participate on [community profile] westerosorting, but I thought the questions seemed interesting so I'm going to answer them here. That way, if I ever do change my mind, I'll have ready-made answers!

Lots of questions and long answers behind the cut )
dolorosa_12: (sister finland)
She is my favourite character in the A Song of Ice and Fire series, and while I don't imagine I'm likely to change any minds, I feel the need to rant a bit.

unpopular opinions and spoilers lurk behind the cut )
dolorosa_12: (Default)
So, about a decade late (I'm a shameless bandwagon-jumper, as you know), I started reading George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series. I'm about halfway through the first book, A Game of Throne, and I adore it immensely, but one thing is bugging me.

cut for spoilers )

Reading this series has rekindled my interest in the Wars of the Roses (I thought I'd never find something to tempt me away from my Angevin and Poitevin obsession). I'm keen to read more books that explore this period of history (either straight historical fiction, or fantasy like A Song of Ice and Fire). Anyone got any suggestions?
dolorosa_12: (Default)
So, about a decade late (I'm a shameless bandwagon-jumper, as you know), I started reading George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series. I'm about halfway through the first book, A Game of Throne, and I adore it immensely, but one thing is bugging me.

cut for spoilers )

Reading this series has rekindled my interest in the Wars of the Roses (I thought I'd never find something to tempt me away from my Angevin and Poitevin obsession). I'm keen to read more books that explore this period of history (either straight historical fiction, or fantasy like A Song of Ice and Fire). Anyone got any suggestions?

Profile

dolorosa_12: (Default)
a million times a trillion more

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 03:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios